On Google’s future

There may be some truth to Farhad Manjoo’s article “Google, mighty now, but not forever”, but suggesting that the decline will come about because of ad revenue is a bit of a stretch.

I quite like Paul Krugman’s suggestion that one company’s domination has to come to an end because lightnings don’t repeatedly strike the same place. These giants are usually based on one bright and flashy idea that ends up revolutionising the whole field.

If there is a decline of Google, it is more likely to come about because a lightning stroke somewhere else. And by investing all over the place, Google is in fact trying to make sure that the lightning strikes something they touch, anyway.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/12/technology/personaltech/googles-time-at-the-top-may-be-nearing-its-end.html?ref=topics

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/14/the-middle-income-trap-and-the-alleged-price-of-success/?module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Opinion&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs&region=Body

Advertisements
On Google’s future

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s